<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anomalist Books &#187; The Haunted Universe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anomalistbooks.com/news/category/the-haunted-universe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anomalistbooks.com/news</link>
	<description>A BLOG ON NEW RELEASES, REVIEWS, AND OTHER NEWS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:13:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Longest Amazon Review Ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.anomalistbooks.com/news/2007/08/21/the-longest-amazon-review-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anomalistbooks.com/news/2007/08/21/the-longest-amazon-review-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Haunted Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anomalistbooks.com/news/2007/08/21/the-longest-amazon-review-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We admit to a preference for positive reviews of our books over negative ones, but here is one negative review that&#8217;s well worth a gander. It&#8217;s an astonishing 5,141-word diatribe on D. Scott Rogo&#8217;s The Haunted Universe. The review, written by Laura Knight-Jadczyk, appears on the Amazon page for Rogo&#8217;s book. Anyone who cares to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.anomalistbooks.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/1933665157.thumbnail.jpg' class="left"alt='The Haunted Universe' />We admit to a preference for positive reviews of our books over negative ones, but here is one negative review that&#8217;s well worth a gander. It&#8217;s an astonishing 5,141-word diatribe on D. Scott Rogo&#8217;s <a href="http://www.anomalistbooks.com/rogo.html#THE_HAUNTED"><em><strong>The Haunted Universe</strong></em></a>. The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1933665157/theanomalist">review</a>, written by Laura Knight-Jadczyk, appears on the Amazon page for Rogo&#8217;s book. Anyone who cares to write that much about one of our books earns the right not to like it in our opinion. But it&#8217;s not all bad news by any means. Knight-Jadczyk begins by citing several statements by Rogo that she has &#8220;discovered&#8221; herself. Elsewhere she &#8220;agrees&#8221; with Rogo and admits he &#8220;does a pretty good job&#8221; here and there. What really seems to set her off, however, is Rogo&#8217;s treatment of the &#8220;Lethbridge experience,&#8221; referring to Tom Lethbridge, the director of excavations for the Cambridge Antiquarian Society who had no interest in psychical research until after he retired. She states that &#8220;Rogo has manipulated the facts and avoided valuable data that lead to other explanations for many of the things dismissed or misinterpreted by Rogo.&#8221; This criticism goes on for half of the stunningly long review, before she finally awards Rogo &#8220;two stars for trying.&#8221; One person who provides a blistering <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/discussionboard/discussion.html/ref=cm_cd_md_plReviewDetail/?ie=UTF8&#038;cdForum=&#038;ASIN=0451075080&#038;cdPage=1&#038;cdItems=10&#038;asin=&#038;store=yourstore&#038;cdSort=ByDateCreated&#038;cdThread=Tx2BRPT41BBLROV&#038;reviewID=R9FA9KF92YEHB&#038;displayType=ReviewDetail&#038;cdSortDir=Ascending#Mx1O8QENL6246OZ">comment</a> of her review on Amazon states that the reviewer manages to make Rogo sound like &#8220;a perfectly reasonable writer&#8230;&#8221; and also says: &#8220;I wanted to know more about [the review's] author and wasn&#8217;t dissapointed when I found her blog and related websites.&#8221; Indeed, it seems to us that Knight-Jadczyk has several axes to grind and is not exactly well loved in the blogosphere. We&#8217;ll just leave it at that and step out of the way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anomalistbooks.com/news/2007/08/21/the-longest-amazon-review-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
